Gillmor on SOPA: It’s not about piracy

A common thread through the SOPA drama is that Congress is legislating from a position of ignorance on how the Internet works. In a column for the Guardian today, Dan Gillmor argues the opposite:

[…] What we’re seeing does not derive from any misunderstanding. Rather, I’m convinced, this concerted push to censor the internet, through measures that would fundamentally break it, stems from a very clear understanding of what’s at stake. Indeed, legislation like Sopa, or its US Senate companion, the Protect IP Act (Pipa) – and a host of activities around the world – share a common goal. These “fixes” are designed to wrest control of these tools from the masses and recentralize what has promised to be the most open means of communication and collaboration ever invented.

I’d take this one step further and posit the question: Do you think WikiLeaks could exist in a SOPA-fied world? Not a chance.

(Also: Interesting that Gillmor frames it as an attempt to recentralize the Internet. Seems like we are doing a pretty good job of that ourselves with the current generation of social networks.)

One thought on “Gillmor on SOPA: It’s not about piracy

  1. Tyler

    I don’t think its centralization vs decentralization. From my experience building decentralized social networks its my opinion that a centralized web is actually better.

    However, its all about who controls that centralization. With facebook, google+, and twitter, you can choose where you want to centralize your data. If SOPA et al. passes, that choice goes away

Comments are closed.